söndag 25 april 2010

Britain's voting system ripe for change

The election campaign has brought out the undercurrent of dissatisfaction with the electoral system, to the point that one of the themes is proportional representation.

Against, it argued that one of the biggest problems of PR is in minority parties either keeping unpopular majorities in power. However, with first past the post, with first past the post, all the parties are bidding for the few hundred thousand decisive votes. That is why so many of their policies are so similar and fail to address real issues. It is corrupting.

Of course the PR system has to be the right one, and that will be difficult. We don't want voting lists filled up with hacks selected by the party machine, which is what happened at the Euro election last year, and it would not be a good thing to lose the connection between a smallish constituency and its representative.

Single transferable vote is probably the best way to keep the best of the present system.

Of course no voting system will produce a satisfactory government in the absence of a sound alternative ideology to a flawed libertarianism on the one hand and discredited socialism on the other. Mixtures of the two, such as the LibDems are peddling, are no solution. If you mix two poisons, the result is still poison.

Inga kommentarer:

Ultimate net zero lunacy?

The ultimate net zero lunacy is probably de-carbonising and trying to electrify the entire railway system.  In the first place, the railways...